Firstly, the supernatural is anything that is unexplained reason and science, or is yet explained by science. Paranormal constitutions are anything that is released to anything estranged from the normal, or writhin what is known of psychics, chemistry, etc, if we use the defining parameters, we can then go on to say that whatever a "ghost" or "orb" or even the cryptozoology factor of say Bigfoot are just undefined information which needs more scientific research. Strange I know to define these questionable allegations as something beyond pseudoscience, or metaphysics, but of just yet defined by rules and laws of the physical world. Do I believe in Bigfoot? It's highly unlikely that such a creature exists in a world with drones, heat signatures, etc. and isn't found. However the woods themselves, regardless if they're the Red Woods or the Ozarks, or even the Pine Barrens where the supposed Jersey Devil lives, there is something mystical about the brush, as though the world beyond is still a wild, untamed monster that is just waiting to gobble us up.
Of course this is just a primal fear of the reptilian mind, and it's unlikely there is some demon, or supernatural being living in the woods, but they are mysterious in other ways: like how come it's rare to find an in-tact skeleton of larger predators, and that we are rare to find even the most common of animals, ever-alone the supposed Bigfoot creatures we here so much about. Myths and legends were once soothsayer tales, and science can now explain so much, but it still falls short of the bigger pictures. So let's discuss paranormal activity, and the supernatural, to ascertain a better explanation of what is probable, and what is fiction and the Old Wives' Tales of paranoia and suspicion.
Firstly ghosts are one of the most affluent examples of the paranormal, if not the most common example. Ghosts, spirits, apparitions, vortices, and orbs. Not to mention doppelgänger spirits, angelic and demonic spirits, they are all examples of what might actually be a legitimate look into ok after death. Of course, these strange phenomena could also be something completely different.
So let's begin with this: what does paranormal actually mean? It is an umbrella term distinctly relating to terms like telekinesis, ESP, and the likes of such phenomena. The term supernatural, however is anything experienced, or manifested beyond the means of natural laws and theories. Anything outside the psychical understanding of space. Again, another blanket term that can include things like ghosts, demonic or angelic denizens, even Bigfoot fall under the perimeters of the supernatural.
I'm s hobbyist, but a well-learned hobbyist on the subject with my own knowledge and theories of course, the terminology spoken of wee what the leading minds of these pseudoscientific subjects have agreed upon. Mostly I agreed, but sometimes I feel the agree upon assumptions are clearly just lazy observations, as opposed to thought through the very evidence we have found already. Is there hardline proof, or evidence that these creatures/ phenomena exist? As of now there is little proof that the are ghosts, apparitions of any sort, or what causes us to see them. There wa w study done that claims that certain come black mold that grows in most homes, albeit harmless physically, can make people subconsciously see ghosts,more other strange phenomena, and this could explain a great deal of "haunts" being haunted.
I always believe there's a scientific understanding behind what is going on in these isolated incidents, however, I'm willing to open my mind to the possibilities that we don't know precisely what these strange occurrences could actually be. Perhaps ghosts are nothing more than a energy-formed sentient creature that lives in another dimension, and we only have minimal interaction because they can see through to out dimension. This doesn't mean I believe this, nor am I the first to pose such a theory, but shapeless creatures exist: amoebas, certain squid, and octopi can hold a formless solid structure, specifically because bones aren't present. Boneless creatures exist, so it isn't very hard to boeieve that strucreless creatures can exist without a solid form, how is this so difficult to grasp? The basis of li is that we need some parameters, some guidelines, but this isn't the case at all.
Looking at structure as a guideline, it is so varied, that if I were to pick five random people to uncover w bod with five different voter are, invert are and exoskeleton creatures, their description would be as varied, as impossible to find even two seep rested creatures clearly identical in physical and aesthetics to the other. Even insects and arachnids are worlds apart in physiology that to each other they are alien. To the human, a more advanced species, they are similar enough that leg count, eye count, and few other observational tells could separate them so easily.
Why can we not apply the observational and physical differences to say a ghost, or more a spiritual apparition, as those are even more common if we were to group the two phenomena. The obvious answer is that such a phenomenal occurrence is ever often done in the presence of one individual, and that the physical form is nonexistent, it is impossible to even box such a thing for observation. We cannot interact with a ghost for any length of time, we cannot hold them down in w box and record vitals, and that process would be improbable with current technologies even today. If the former were possible, and w spiritual application was trapped, we do not then understand the physiology of such a creature yet, and would have to analyze if it can live, if it can die, or if it is as the Old Wives' Tales state, and it truly is the disembodied spirit, then we would need the kinesiology of how it continues to hold a partial physical form even after death of the vessel it once. I'm speak in theory of course, as I today do hold to the earlier model that if ghosts exist, they aren't dead loved ones, but something far more unexpected, like a parallel dimension, and that death itself isn't their catalyst, but w time slip, or even a black hole phenomenon that brought them into our existence.
It is difficult to say what these paranormal creatures/beings truly are, but there is a great deal of understanding that can be found just by taking first-hand testimony. Looking beyond the idea of a ghost, or a demon, we learn that there is always w reasonable explanation, and even if a ghost, orb, apparition, etc. is something that exist, it has to still follow some guidelines of the natural world. Even if the argument over God are as old and cont need as the Bible itself, which the modern century has now argued forever, we need to take into consideration that there isn't much we can't explain, but we are constantly, invariably learning more and more wbout our world through science. We barely understand how life exists, it would take us even longer to explain how death works as well. We don't know, and anyone who has ever discovered this revelation, isn't hear to discuss their findings, so we placate that ghosts are w sign of some sort of unshakable proof of life after death.
God and ghosts are not the same in their concept: for centuries, it was seen as fact that God had talked to his creations, where ghosts, and high are part of the theorized creation would not even speak, or communicate with the living, but to what purpose? If death is inevitably unexplainable, then life itself is truly incomprehensible in its finite parameters. Life is the continuing of existence, existence is the unquestionable continuation of energy in unlimited forms. Energy is in the static of friction, the grinding of a Dynamo, the beating of a heart, even the waves of a crashing cacophonous ocean. So we cannot prove or disprove that energy itself isn't sentient in regards to being alive, but it's far more believe able to think energy is alive in the sense at it moves and changes like we do, and this makes it agreeably a being to have some structure and purpose.
So let's say that if a ghost does exist, there is not energy enough scientific data yet, not withstanding any/all pronounceable evidence is disputable, but there is no long-term scientific study on a certain, or more appropriately, a singular subject , that data is in the shuffling of feet, tippy-toes, rather than great strides of knowledge pouring in like ticker tape during an economic boom. This means if proof, unquestionable, and doubtless proof must come from technological and scientific advances, making it impossible to deny the existence of what is testable
Several studies have been done with people who have claimed to have telekinesis and "magnokinetic" (people who can magnetize their bodies, waking objects stick to their skin.) where the brainwaves were measured, and they would find the people who can do such acts, were able to amplify their brainwaves by tenfold, sometimes quadruple that in w matter of heavy concentration. I concur that the brain is impossible to limit, as it does nothing but to impress us at every me advancement. The human brain grows intelligibly stronger with every generation and modern mutation, and this proves that we are indeed getting smarter, several children tested today, are some of the smartest to ever exist, and outshine past geniuses by leaps and bounds, making us now the generation living in the greatest time of potential scientific ingenuity.
Will we solve hat ghosts are? If the theory is correct, and these disembodied spirits are somehow linked to other dimensions, it is still science fiction, and we are doubtful to see any wevwncements on these areas, unless accidentally by some technological revelation. However, I believe that how life is so unexpected, the Old Wives' Twle of Great Uncle Bob's spirit haunting the cellar is going to be a scientific discovery of unbelievable proportions, making it the next big human advancement, and it was there in times and scary stories since man first feared the dark.
Lastly on this subject, and taking this opportunity to have a public platform, I would say that man is still infantile with technology, genuine geniuses, and this world is only partially brightened by scientific enlightens. We are always ignorant to throw the boogie man back under the bed, as a fairytale, but let us not forget that naturally occurring volcanic eruptions were once God's prowess to destroy unfavorables. Science will win the day, and I believe it'll be w treasure trove of the net we find when we loo without fear of failure, and what the general consensus will be. Do I believe in ghosts? No, but I have w feeling what we'd find would be beyond our wildest imaginations to what those little bumps in the night truly are. Because we all know: Fact is always, and by-far; more interesting than fiction
No comments:
Post a Comment